<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PD Smith &#187; Reviewing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/category/reviewing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com</link>
	<description>Kafka’s mouse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:46:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Seasons of Life</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/08/11/seasons-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/08/11/seasons-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhythms of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seasons of Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian has just published my review of Russell G Foster and Leon Kreitzman's fascinating new book, Seasons of Life: The Biological Rhythms that Living Things Need to Thrive and Survive. Their first book, Rhythms of Life (2004) - which I reviewed for the Independent - explored the science of the circadian clock (circa, about; dies, day) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Guardian</em> has just published my review of Russell G Foster and Leon Kreitzman's fascinating new book, <em>Seasons of Life: The Biological Rhythms that Living Things Need to Thrive and Survive</em>. Their first book, <em>Rhythms of Life</em> (2004) - which I reviewed for the <a title="Inde" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/rhythms-of-life-by-russell-g-foster-and-leon-kreitzman-559041.html" target="_blank"><em>Independent</em> </a>- explored the science of the circadian clock (<em>circa</em>, about; <em>dies</em>, day) and explained how cells and "clock" genes form a molecular metronome inside us that synchronises body-time with world-time across 24 hours.</p>
<p>Their new book shows that, as well as a 24-hour clock, organisms contain a circannual clock with a periodicity of a year. These two studies provide a remarkable glimpse into the working of nature's inbuilt timing mechanisms. You can read my review of <em>Seasons of Life </em><a title="Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/aug/08/seasons-of-life-foster-review" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/08/11/seasons-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ground Control</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/10/ground-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/10/ground-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Minton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may not have noticed, but our cities are changing. As Anna Minton shows in her excellent new study, Ground Control: Fear and Happiness in the 21st-century City, the development of Canary Wharf in the 1990s blazed a trail that is now being followed in cities across the UK, creating privatized, personality-free zones stripped of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may not have noticed, but our cities are changing. As <a title="Minton" href="http://www.annaminton.com/index.htm" target="_blank">Anna Minton</a> shows in her excellent new study, <em><a title="Azn" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Ground-Control-Fear-Happiness-Twenty-First-Century/dp/0141033916/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1247239060&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank">Ground Control</a>: Fear and Happiness in the 21st-century City</em>, the development of Canary Wharf in the 1990s blazed a trail that is now being followed in cities across the UK, creating privatized, personality-free zones stripped of any historical or cultural uniqueness. These hi-tech “defensible spaces” are promoted as being “clean and safe”. But they are also sterile and soulless. Pat, a hairdresser who has lived on the Isle of Dogs for 37 years, says of Canary Wharf today: “I don’t like going there. It always gives me the fear.”</p>
<p><img class="left" title="Ground Control" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Minton-195x300.jpg" alt="Ground Control" width="195" height="300" />Sections of our city centres are being sold off to private developers to create shopping monocultures such as Westfield London or "malls without walls" like Stratford City, which is being built for the 2012 Olympics and is one of the largest retail-led developments in Europe. It is, says Minton, "a private city within a city" and represents a return to the early 19th century when aristocrats owned great swathes of London, fortifying their estates of up-market housing with gates and private security forces.</p>
<p>Now, “land and property which has been in public hands for 150 years or more is moving back into private hands”. Minton argues that today’s privatised city centres and gated communities are fostering "a new culture of authoritarianism and control". Private security guards watch and record our every move with CCTV: the UK now has more surveillance cameras than the rest of Europe combined. The small city of Coventry will soon have 700. At Stratford City they intend to use unmanned aerial drones to watch the streets. In these privatized zones, security guards routinely move on beggars and the homeless, and they can even ban groups of young people and prevent the taking of photographs.</p>
<p>Our modern houses and streets may be "secured by design" (to quote the jargon), but Minton’s compelling argument is that "we are making the city a far more fearful place". The obsession with security and the privatisation of public space is also “a challenge to a type of public life, public culture and democracy in British cities” that has existed since at least the nineteenth century. Instead of local councils "owning" the city for us, now our streets and buildings (for example, Manchester’s Free Trade Hall) are being bought by investors. According to Minton, “today the ‘public good’ is what makes the most money”. It is government policy to sell off local authority assets worth £30 billion by 2010. The manager of one “Business Improvement District” controlling a city centre tells her: “Bugger democracy. Customer focus is not democratic.”</p>
<p>Clearly, it is important that cities should have vibrant economies. But in Britain the pursuit of profit threatens to undermine the quality of urban life. Minton’s book is a powerful indictment of urban planning in the UK under both Conservative and New Labour governments. It is essential reading for anyone concerned about how our cities will feel and function in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/10/ground-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leviathan or, The Whale</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/08/leviathan-or-the-whale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/08/leviathan-or-the-whale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moby Dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Hoare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Johnson Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times Literary Supplement has just published my review of Philip Hoare's Leviathan or, The Whale, the deserving winner of this year's Samuel Johnson prize. “Perhaps it is because I was nearly born underwater.” The first sentence of Philip Hoare’s memorable study of whales points teasingly to an early affinity between author and subject. His [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Times Literary Supplement </em>has just published my review of Philip Hoare's <em>Leviathan or, The Whale</em>, the deserving winner of this year's Samuel Johnson prize.</p>
<p>“Perhaps it is because I was nearly born underwater.” The first sentence of Philip Hoare’s memorable study of whales points teasingly to an early affinity between author and subject. His mother began to feel labour pains while on a tour of a submarine in Portsmouth harbour. As a boy he lay awake at night listening to the “clanking dredgers” gouging a channel through Southampton Water for the liners and container ships.</p>
<p>But although the sea was a formative influence it was also a source of anxiety: “I have always been afraid of deep water.” School trips to Southampton’s municipal swimming pool did nothing to cure his fear. He only learnt to swim as an adult. But now he admits to feeling claustrophobic if he is far from the sea and, like Ishmael in Herman Melville’s epic novel <em>Moby-Dick </em>(1851), Hoare is “haunted” by the whale.</p>
<p>Read my review <a title="review" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/leviathan-or-the-whale/" target="_self">here</a> and listen to Claire Armitstead's interview with the author at the <a title="Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/audio/2009/jul/03/philip-hoare-leviathan" target="_blank">Guardian</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/07/08/leviathan-or-the-whale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delirious New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/06/24/delirious-new-orleans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/06/24/delirious-new-orleans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Literary Supplement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times Literary Supplement has just published my review of Stephen Verderber's superb study Delirious New Orleans: Manifesto for an extraordinary American city (University of Texas Press). It's not on their site yet but you can read my version here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong><em>Times Literary Supplement </em></strong>has just published my review of Stephen Verderber's superb study <em>Delirious New Orleans: Manifesto for an extraordinary American city</em> (University of Texas Press). It's not on their site yet but you can read my version <a title="Delirious New Orleans" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/delirious-new-orleans/" target="_self">here</a>.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-504" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/DNO-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/06/24/delirious-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two legs good, four legs better, six legs brilliant</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Moreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galvani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HG Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey A Lockwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Auge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavlov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rom Harre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schrodinger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian has just printed my review of three books on the way science has used and sometimes misused animals and insects: Pavlov's Dogs and Schrödinger's Cat: Scenes from the Living Laboratory, by Rom Harré; The Lives of Ants, by Laurent Keller and Élisabeth Gordon (translated by James Grieve); Six-Legged Soldiers: Using Insects as Weapons of War, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Guardian</em> has just printed my review of three books on the way science has used and sometimes misused animals and insects: <em>Pavlov's Dogs and Schrödinger's Cat: Scenes from the Living Laboratory</em>, by Rom Harré; <em>The Lives of Ants</em>, by Laurent Keller and Élisabeth Gordon (translated by James Grieve); <em>Six-Legged Soldiers: Using Insects as Weapons of War</em>, by Jeffrey A Lockwood. All published by Oxford University Press and all are well worth reading.</p>
<blockquote><p>"The thing before you is no longer an animal, a fellow-creature, but a problem," says HG Wells's mad vivisector Dr Moreau, attempting to justify his grotesque animal experiments. In Pavlov's Dogs and Schrödinger's Cat, the philosopher and psychologist Rom Harré explores the history of scientists who have used plants and animals - the "living laboratory" - to test hypotheses and collect data. But Harré's original and thoughtful study is not explicitly about the ethics of animal experimentation. Instead, he wants to show how the instrumentarium of science is not restricted to beakers and Bunsen burners, but has always included organic apparatus, from Galvani's frog's legs twitching with electricity, to Mendel's pea plants, to thought experiments such as Schrödinger's cat, poised eternally (and inhumanely) between life and death. Indeed, the living laboratory is at the very heart of science, he argues: "animals and plants become devices we research with rather than something we research on".</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest <a title="Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/mar/28/science-books-insects-animals-review" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>In the same issue are two of my regular short paperback reviews, this time on an urban theme. The first is on that uniquely English phenomenon: the seaside town - <em><a title="Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/mar/27/designing-seasdide-fred-gray-review" target="_blank">Designing the Seaside: Architecture, Society and Nature</a>, </em>by Fred Gray. The second is anthropologist Marc Augé's haunting analysis of modern urban spaces, <em><a title="Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/mar/28/non-places-marc-auge-review" target="_blank">Non-Places: An Introduction to Supermodernity</a></em>, reissued with a new introduction by Verso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shish-kebab with a spud</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/08/16/shish-kebab-with-a-spud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/08/16/shish-kebab-with-a-spud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/08/16/shish-kebab-with-a-spud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been reading some great books recently. A Nuclear Family Vacation: Travels in the World of Atomic Weaponry (Bloomsbury) is by Nathan Hodge and Sharon Weinberger, a husband-and-wife team of US defence reporters turned nuclear tourists. Rather than relaxing on the Florida beach for their holidays they travelled the world in search of nuclear sites. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been reading some great books recently.</p>
<p><em>A Nuclear Family Vacation: Travels in the World of Atomic Weaponry</em> (Bloomsbury) is by Nathan Hodge and Sharon Weinberger, a husband-and-wife team of US defence <img width="243" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/nuclear-family-vacation.jpg" alt="A Nuclear Family Vac" height="230" style="width: 243px; height: 230px" title="A Nuclear Family Vac" class="left" />reporters turned nuclear tourists. Rather than relaxing on the Florida beach for their holidays they travelled the world in search of nuclear sites. It's an entertaining and informative read with an important conclusion. The whole "nuclear weapons complex", costing billions of dollars a year, is an enterprise that has "lost its way". According to Hodge and Weinberger, it may be time for the US to think the unthinkable and "explore practical options for eliminating the nuclear arsenal". Read more in my review for the <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/aug/16/travel?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=fromtheguardian" title="Guardian">Guardian</a></em>.</p>
<p>Also in the <em>Guardian</em> are a couple of paperback reviews.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/aug/16/scienceandnature.roundupreviews1" title="Guardian"><em>Follow the Water: Exploring the Sea to Discover Climate</em> </a>(Basic Books) is an excellent introduction to oceanography by novelist and keen sailor Dallas Murphy. At nearly 900 pages, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/aug/16/scienceandnature.roundupreviews" title="Guardian"><em>Cosmos: An Illustrated History of Astronomy and Cosmology</em> </a>by John North (Chicago) is a suitably monumental book about the biggest subject of all. First published in 1993 and now updated and reissued with many beautiful illustrations, this is a definitive history of our love affair with the stars.</p>
<p>Last but by no means least - because believe it or not this book is actually bigger than <em>Cosmos</em> - is the <em>Chambers Dictionary of Science and Technology </em>(Chambers). At over 1370 pages and a full 7 cm thick, this weighty tome is a must-have addition to the library of any science buff, fact checker, word lover, or wannabe contestant of <em>University Challenge</em>. Read my full review, intriguingly titled "Shish-kebab with a spud", in this week's <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/shish-kebab-with-a-spud/" title="TLS">Times Literary Supplement</a></em> (August 15, 2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/08/16/shish-kebab-with-a-spud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tragic Sense of Life</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/23/the-tragic-sense-of-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/23/the-tragic-sense-of-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haeckel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RJ Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/23/the-tragic-sense-of-life/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times Literary Supplement has just published my review of The Tragic Sense of Life: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought, by Robert J. Richards. It is an immensely impressive work of biography and intellectual history, and a fitting testament to a complex and contradictory character, a man Richards describes as a “polymorphic scientist-artist-adventurer”. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Times Literary Supplement</em> has just published my review of <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/267959.ctl">The Tragic Sense of Life</a>: Ernst Haeckel and the Struggle over Evolutionary Thought</em>, by Robert J. Richards. It is an immensely impressive work of biography and intellectual history, and a fitting testament to a complex and contradictory character, a man Richards describes as a “polymorphic scientist-artist-adventurer”.</p>
<p><img width="251" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/richards-haeckel-copy.jpg" alt="Tragic sense of life" height="316" style="width: 251px; height: 316px" title="Tragic sense of life" class="left" />In his own day, Haeckel was a hugely controversial figure and a hate-figure for many Christians because of his relentless harrying of their beliefs. Historians have savaged Haeckel's reputation and Richards accepts that he was “a man of contradictions”, a driven character and a divisive figure.</p>
<p>But Richards succeeds brilliantly in re-establishing Haeckel as a significant scientist and a major player in the history of evolutionary thought. Richards is particularly good at tracing the origins of Haeckel’s “Romantic evolutionism”. As the author of an earlier and equally impressive study of how Romanticism shaped biological thought in the first half of nineteenth century, <em>The Romantic Conception of Life</em> (2002), Richards is ideally qualified for this task.</p>
<p>Before World War I, more people learned about evolutionary theory from Haeckel than any other source, including Darwin’s own writings. In <em>The Descent of Man</em>, Darwin himself praised one of Haeckel’s books, saying “if this work had appeared before my essay had been written, I should probably never have completed it.” Richards portrays Haeckel as an unjustly forgotten genius, a figure of “startling creativity, tireless industry, and deep artistic talent”. Richards argues that Haeckel was Darwin’s “authentic intellectual heir”.</p>
<p>You can read my review in this week's TLS (25 July), or read a longer version <a target="_blank" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/the-tragic-sense-of-life/" title="Richards review">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/23/the-tragic-sense-of-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films of Fact</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/17/films-of-fact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/17/films-of-fact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/17/films-of-fact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  I've just reviewed Timothy Boon's excellent Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television for the Times Literary Supplement. You can read my version here. The book accompanies an exhibition at the Science Museum. More about that here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="middle" width="180" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/films-of-fact.jpg" alt="Films of Fact" height="221" style="width: 180px; height: 221px" title="Films of Fact" /> </p>
<p>I've just reviewed Timothy Boon's excellent <em>Films of Fact: A History of Science in Documentary Films and Television</em> for the <em>Times Literary Supplement</em>. You can read my version <a target="_blank" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/films-of-fact/" title="Boon review">here</a>.</p>
<p>The book accompanies an exhibition at the Science Museum. More about that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/visitmuseum/galleries/films_of_fact.aspx" title="Sci Mus">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/07/17/films-of-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science and the cinema</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/06/05/science-and-the-cinema/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/06/05/science-and-the-cinema/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/06/05/science-and-the-cinema/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week's issue of the Times Literary Supplement contains my review of two intriguing but rather different books: H.G. Wells, Modernity and the Movies, by Keith Williams (Liverpool UP, 2007), and Hollywood Science: Movies, Science, &#38; the End of the World, by Sidney Perkowitz (Columbia UP, 2007). Both are well worth reading. Williams' book sent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="214" src="http://www.peterdsmith.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/417fwbwzsdl_ss500_1.jpg" alt="Wells, Invisible Man" height="320" style="width: 214px; height: 320px" title="Wells, Invisible Man" class="right" />This week's issue of the <em>Times Literary Supplement</em> contains my review of two intriguing but rather different books: <em>H.G. Wells, Modernity and the Movies</em>, by Keith Williams (Liverpool UP, 2007), and <em>Hollywood Science: Movies, Science, &amp; the End of the World</em>, by Sidney Perkowitz (Columbia UP, 2007).</p>
<p>Both are well worth reading. Williams' book sent me back to Wells' novel <em>When the Sleeper Wakes</em> (1899). I'd forgotten what an extraordinary book it is.</p>
<p>The review is not yet online, but you can read my version of it <a target="_blank" href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/science-and-the-cinema/" title="sci &amp; cinema">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/06/05/science-and-the-cinema/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murder, he wrote</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/04/19/murder-he-wrote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/04/19/murder-he-wrote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PD Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/04/19/murder-he-wrote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 19th century, English juries and judges were notoriously sceptical about scientific evidence. According to the historian of forensic science Colin Evans, there was "a visceral distaste for the laboratory as a crime-fighting tool". But in the 20th century, a real-life Sherlock Holmes emerged whose "almost supernatural deductive gifts" won the confidence of lawyers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 19th century, English juries and judges were notoriously sceptical about scientific evidence. According to the historian of forensic science Colin Evans, there was "a visceral distaste for the laboratory as a crime-fighting tool". But in the 20th century, a real-life Sherlock Holmes emerged whose "almost supernatural deductive gifts" won the confidence of lawyers and public alike. He was Home Office pathologist Sir Bernard Spilsbury.</p>
<p>I've just reviewed <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Father-Forensics-Bernard-Spilsbury-Invented/dp/1840468637/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1208613332&amp;sr=1-2" title="Az">The Father of Forensics</a></em>, Evans' new biography of Spilsbury. It's a compelling but gruesome read. My review is in today's <em>Guardian</em>. Be warned: it's not for the squeamish...</p>
<p>Read it <a target="_blank" href="http://books.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2274737,00.html" title="Guardian">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2008/04/19/murder-he-wrote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.642 seconds -->
