<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two legs good, four legs better, six legs brilliant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/</link>
	<description>Kafka’s mouse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:49:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippa Goldschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.peterdsmith.com/archives/2009/03/28/two-legs-good-four-legs-better-six-legs-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippa Goldschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterdsmith.com/?p=468#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Schrodinger&#039;s cat is not just a thought experiment. It was designed to be a reductio ad absurdam to show that the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics fails to describe the &#039;real&#039; world. 
Schrodinger thought it was ridiculous to suggest that a real cat could be both alive and dead until observed.
Unfortunately it&#039;s backfired in some ways, in that it&#039;s associated Schrodinger with the idea he sought to discredit. And no one&#039;s been able to work out exactly why reality doesn&#039;t behave in the way described by the Copenhagen interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schrodinger's cat is not just a thought experiment. It was designed to be a reductio ad absurdam to show that the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics fails to describe the 'real' world.<br />
Schrodinger thought it was ridiculous to suggest that a real cat could be both alive and dead until observed.<br />
Unfortunately it's backfired in some ways, in that it's associated Schrodinger with the idea he sought to discredit. And no one's been able to work out exactly why reality doesn't behave in the way described by the Copenhagen interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.412 seconds -->
